248 research outputs found
Formalization, Mechanization and Automation of G\"odel's Proof of God's Existence
G\"odel's ontological proof has been analysed for the first-time with an
unprecedent degree of detail and formality with the help of higher-order
theorem provers. The following has been done (and in this order): A detailed
natural deduction proof. A formalization of the axioms, definitions and
theorems in the TPTP THF syntax. Automatic verification of the consistency of
the axioms and definitions with Nitpick. Automatic demonstration of the
theorems with the provers LEO-II and Satallax. A step-by-step formalization
using the Coq proof assistant. A formalization using the Isabelle proof
assistant, where the theorems (and some additional lemmata) have been automated
with Sledgehammer and Metis.Comment: 2 page
The Wise Men Puzzle (Isabelle/HOL dataset)
The authors universal (meta-)logical reasoning approach is demonstrated and assessed with a prominent riddle in epistemic reasoning: the Wise Men Puzzle. The presented solution puts a particular emphasis on the adequate modeling of common knowledge and it illustrates the elegance and the practical relevance of the shallow semantical embedding approach when utilized within modern proof assistant systems such as Isabelle/HOL. The contributed dataset provides supporting evidence for claims made in the article “Universal (meta-)logical reasoning: Recent successes” (Benzmüller, 2019)
Systematic Verification of the Modal Logic Cube in Isabelle/HOL
We present an automated verification of the well-known modal logic cube in
Isabelle/HOL, in which we prove the inclusion relations between the cube's
logics using automated reasoning tools. Prior work addresses this problem but
without restriction to the modal logic cube, and using encodings in first-order
logic in combination with first-order automated theorem provers. In contrast,
our solution is more elegant, transparent and effective. It employs an
embedding of quantified modal logic in classical higher-order logic. Automated
reasoning tools, such as Sledgehammer with LEO-II, Satallax and CVC4, Metis and
Nitpick, are employed to achieve full automation. Though successful, the
experiments also motivate some technical improvements in the Isabelle/HOL tool.Comment: In Proceedings PxTP 2015, arXiv:1507.0837
LeoPARD --- A Generic Platform for the Implementation of Higher-Order Reasoners
LeoPARD supports the implementation of knowledge representation and reasoning
tools for higher-order logic(s). It combines a sophisticated data structure
layer (polymorphically typed {\lambda}-calculus with nameless spine notation,
explicit substitutions, and perfect term sharing) with an ambitious multi-agent
blackboard architecture (supporting prover parallelism at the term, clause, and
search level). Further features of LeoPARD include a parser for all TPTP
dialects, a command line interpreter, and generic means for the integration of
external reasoners.Comment: 6 pages, to appear in the proceedings of CICM'2015 conferenc
Computer Science and Metaphysics: A Cross-Fertilization
Computational philosophy is the use of mechanized computational techniques to
unearth philosophical insights that are either difficult or impossible to find
using traditional philosophical methods. Computational metaphysics is
computational philosophy with a focus on metaphysics. In this paper, we (a)
develop results in modal metaphysics whose discovery was computer assisted, and
(b) conclude that these results work not only to the obvious benefit of
philosophy but also, less obviously, to the benefit of computer science, since
the new computational techniques that led to these results may be more broadly
applicable within computer science. The paper includes a description of our
background methodology and how it evolved, and a discussion of our new results.Comment: 39 pages, 3 figure
Mechanizing Principia Logico-Metaphysica in Functional Type Theory
Principia Logico-Metaphysica contains a foundational logical theory for
metaphysics, mathematics, and the sciences. It includes a canonical development
of Abstract Object Theory [AOT], a metaphysical theory (inspired by ideas of
Ernst Mally, formalized by Zalta) that distinguishes between ordinary and
abstract objects.
This article reports on recent work in which AOT has been successfully
represented and partly automated in the proof assistant system Isabelle/HOL.
Initial experiments within this framework reveal a crucial but overlooked fact:
a deeply-rooted and known paradox is reintroduced in AOT when the logic of
complex terms is simply adjoined to AOT's specially-formulated comprehension
principle for relations. This result constitutes a new and important paradox,
given how much expressive and analytic power is contributed by having the two
kinds of complex terms in the system. Its discovery is the highlight of our
joint project and provides strong evidence for a new kind of scientific
practice in philosophy, namely, computational metaphysics.
Our results were made technically possible by a suitable adaptation of
Benzm\"uller's metalogical approach to universal reasoning by semantically
embedding theories in classical higher-order logic. This approach enables one
to reuse state-of-the-art higher-order proof assistants, such as Isabelle/HOL,
for mechanizing and experimentally exploring challenging logics and theories
such as AOT. Our results also provide a fresh perspective on the question of
whether relational type theory or functional type theory better serves as a
foundation for logic and metaphysics.Comment: 14 pages, 6 figures; preprint of article with same title to appear in
The Review of Symbolic Logi
- …